Skip to content

Conversation

c410-f3r
Copy link
Contributor

@c410-f3r c410-f3r commented Aug 31, 2023

#115177 added the symbols for arithmetic_side_effects and now this PR actually uses them to prevent an eventual removal. All because #115183 was recently merged and next Clippy update will probably take some time to happen.

Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#11392

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 31, 2023

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 31, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 31, 2023

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@c410-f3r
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot labels -T-libs +T-compiler

r? compiler

Is there a better team?

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 31, 2023
@rustbot rustbot assigned oli-obk and unassigned cuviper Aug 31, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@c410-f3r
Copy link
Contributor Author

- *****$DIR*****/arithmetic_side_effects.rs:304:5
+ *****tests/ui*****/arithmetic_side_effects.rs:304:5

For some reason the original $DIR should now be tests/ui, which is strange.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Next Clippy update is in 1 week. So this PR could only add the diag items and then the logic could be changed in a Clippy PR. But that would take another 2 weeks to get in.

I'm good with making an exception here and making functional Clippy changes in the Rust repo in this case.

Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The impl LGTM, but is there a Clippy issue associated with this, that could be linked in this PR?

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @flip1995

@rustbot rustbot assigned flip1995 and unassigned oli-obk Aug 31, 2023
@c410-f3r
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hehehe, sorry for the mess @flip1995.

The related Clippy issue has been attached.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Sep 1, 2023

That seemed to have worked. I rebased and squashed the blessing commits.

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

📌 Commit 0164f7e has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 1, 2023
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Sep 1, 2023

@bors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 0164f7e with merge d6b4d35...

@c410-f3r
Copy link
Contributor Author

c410-f3r commented Sep 1, 2023

Nice! Thank you very much @flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing d6b4d35 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 1, 2023
@bors bors merged commit d6b4d35 into rust-lang:master Sep 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d6b4d35): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.5% [-1.9%, -1.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.5% [-1.9%, -1.1%] 3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-3.0%, -2.8%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 631.878s -> 629.909s (-0.31%)
Artifact size: 316.40 MiB -> 316.39 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[arithmetic_side_effects] Division by NonZeroU* cannot panic
8 participants